Delegates debate possible measures to resolve the Syrian conflict. |
Since
January 26th, 2011 the Syrian people have been rebelling and rioting against
their unjust and oppressive regime. The authoritarian nature of the government
started with Hafez al-Assad as Syria's dictator, and continued when his son
Bashar al-Assad succeeded him in 2000. Al-Assad crushed the Syrian people's
expectations for positive change and their hope for a new era of justice and
modernization. When Hasan Ali Akleh set himself on fire, his suffering
demonstrated the plight of the Syrian people, leading the way for increased
protests against the government.
In
response to these uprisings, the Syrian government ruthlessly retaliated
against its people with escalating violence, including the use of tear gas,
bullets, bombings, and other weaponry. On August 18, 2011, the Human Rights
Council (HRC) condemned the Syrian government for its "widespread and
systematic attacks against its own people" and called for "an
investigation by the International Criminal Court (ICC)." On Saturday, the
Security Council tackled the Syrian issue by passing resolutions 1.2 and 1.4.
Expressing
a deep concern that the Syrian conflict would spill over into surrounding
nations, Resolution 1.2 recommended creating a "living buffer zone"
to be implemented across the Israel-Syria and Lebanon-Syria borders with the
goal of limiting the risk of violence in neighboring countries.
Resolution
1.4 called for a ceasefire on both sides, followed by peace talks in
Switzerland among the parties. The delegate of India, Zoe Allison, expressed
her concern over the possibility of the "ceasefire not working" but
strongly believed that "solving the issue will improve the image of the
United Nations." Because of the dire need for humanitarian aid, both
resolutions also worked to distribute assistance to affected civilians.
In
contrast to the two resolutions that were passed, working paper 1.1 asked for
the removal of Assad and new elections in Syria. During the civil war, Russia
has continually been sending ammunition to Assad, strengthening the alliance
between the two countries. Because of this relationship, the delegate of Russia
vetoed Resolution 1.1.
Furthermore,
the delegate from Russia expressed his concern that this working paper would infringe
upon Syria’s sovereignty since it allowed the UN to restructure the domestic
political system. The delegate of Russia, Louis Varriana, argued that the
"clauses contained within the resolution would set an irresponsible
precedent for future actions."
In
discussing the failure of working paper 1.1, the delegate of Guatemala, Angad
Rawal, believed that the proposal was rejected "because of its very
radical views, the amount of unfriendly amendments not passed, and an indirect
attack on the Ba'ath party in its lack of consideration of Assad."